Understanding the Language ANFA — Decidability

by

🌱 What Exactly Is ANFA?

ANFA is not a language made of normal strings.
Instead, every element in this language is an NFA description.

Here is the idea:

ANFA consists of all NFAs that accept at least one string.

So, if an NFA accepts even a single string — no matter how short —
that NFA belongs to ANFA.

If an NFA accepts nothing at all,
it stays outside the language.

Think of ANFA as asking:

“Is this NFA capable of recognizing anything?”

🤔 Why Do We Care About This?

NFAs allow multiple possible paths.
Because of this nondeterministic nature, people often wonder:

“Can we always check whether an NFA recognizes some string?”

Surprisingly (and happily), the answer is YES.

That makes ANFA a decidable language.

🔍 How Do We Decide ANFA?

An NFA can be imagined like a map full of rooms and passages:

  • Each state is a room
  • Each transition is a doorway
  • ε-moves are hidden tunnels
  • Accepting states are rooms marked with a star
  • The start state is where we begin our walk

The ANFA question becomes:

“Is there any path from the start room to one of the starred rooms?”

To decide this:

1️⃣ Begin at the start state

Follow all ε-moves for free.

2️⃣ Explore all reachable states

Move through every transition (a bit like scanning a small neighborhood).

3️⃣ Check if an accepting state is ever reached

  • If yes → the NFA accepts something → it belongs to ANFA
  • If no → the NFA accepts nothing → it does not belong to ANFA

Since the NFA has a finite number of states, this exploration always finishes.

This is the reason ANFA is decidable — the process never goes on forever.

📘 Simple Diagram to Visualize

Here is a tiny ASCII illustration showing an NFA:

(start) ---> [X]
    |           |
    | ε         | a
    v           v
   [Y] -------> [Z*]

Z* = accepting state

Is this NFA in ANFA?
Yes. There is a path leading to Z, which is an accepting state.

So this NFA recognizes at least one string and therefore belongs to ANFA.

🌟 Another Method (Optional)

Some people prefer a more formal approach:

  1. Convert the NFA to a DFA using subset construction.
  2. Check if any DFA state is both reachable and contains an accepting NFA state.

Because both steps are bounded and mechanical, they always halt.
This proves, again, that ANFA is decidable.