Skip to content
ExamHope Logo

Primary Menu
  • Digital Logic
    • Arithmetic Operations
    • Asynchronous/Ripple Counters
    • Basic Gates
    • Boolean Algebraic Theorems
    • Codes
  • Data Structures
    • Binary Heaps
    • Binary Search
    • Binary Search Trees
    • Binary Tree
    • Binary Tree Sort
    • Bipartite Graphs
    • Complete Graph
  • Theory of Computation
    • Finite Automata
    • Finite Automaton First Example
  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • DMCA Policy
  • Home
  • IT
  • Properly Nested Parentheses — Context-Free Languages
  • IT
  • Properly Nested Parentheses
  • Theory of Computation

Properly Nested Parentheses — Context-Free Languages

examhopeinfo@gmail.com November 22, 2025
Properly Nested Parentheses Theory of Computation

Properly Nested Parentheses Theory of Computation

🌱 What Does “Properly Nested” Mean?

A string of parentheses is properly nested if:

  1. Every opening ( has a matching closing ).
  2. Closing parentheses never appear before a matching opening.
  3. Parentheses are arranged in a neat, logical pattern — either:
  • Side by side like: () () ()
  • Nested inside like: ( ( ) )
  • Or a mix of both: (()())

Here are examples:

✔ Proper: (), (()), (()()), ()()(), ((()()))
✘ Improper: )(, ((), ())(, ((())


🧱 Why Is This Language Context-Free?

Because the structure depends on what’s inside, not what’s around.

For example:

  • If you see S, you can replace it with (S) — meaning you wrap the inside.
  • Or with SS — meaning you place two valid structures next to each other.
  • Or with ε — meaning it can also be empty.

This kind of “build from the inside out” definition is exactly what Context-Free Grammars are designed for.


🎯 A Simple CFG for Properly Nested Parentheses

A commonly used grammar is:

S → (S) | SS | ε

Let’s break this down in simple words:

  • (S) → Add a pair of parentheses around a valid structure
  • SS → Put two valid structures side by side
  • ε → Allow the empty string, which is also balanced

These three rules allow us to build every properly nested parenthesis string.


💡 Building an Example Step-by-Step

Let’s say we want to generate the string:

(()())

Watch how the string grows from the start symbol:

S
→ (S)
→ (SS)
→ (S(S))
→ ((S)(S))
→ (()()( ))
→ (()())

🖼 Parse Tree Diagram (Easy to Read)

Here’s a simple tree showing how (()()) is formed:

                S
            _____|_____
           |          SS
           |       ___|___
           |      S       S
           |     / \     / \
           (    ( S )   ( S )
                 |       |
                 S       S
                 |       |
                 ε       ε

Each branch breaks the string into smaller balanced parts until we’re left with only ( and ).


🧠 Why This Matters in Theory of Computation

Properly nested parentheses are a classic example because:

✔ They cannot be recognized by regular languages

A simple finite automaton has no memory to “remember” how many ( are waiting to be closed.

✔ But they can be recognized by Pushdown Automata

A PDA uses a stack, which can push ( and pop when it sees ) — perfect for matching pairs.

✔ They demonstrate the power of CFGs

CFGs handle nested patterns beautifully and naturally.


About the Author

examhopeinfo@gmail.com

Administrator

Visit Website View All Posts

Post navigation

Previous: Context-Free Grammars — Context-Free Languages
Next: Context-Free Grammar for a Nonregular Language

Related News

Understanding the Role of the Lexical Analyzer
  • Role of the Lexical Analyzer
  • Compiler Design
  • IT

Lexical Analysis — Understanding the Role of the Lexical Analyzer

examhopeinfo@gmail.com December 5, 2025
Parsing A Simple Ompass Compiler
  • IT
  • Compiler Design
  • Parsing

Parsing — A Simple Onepass Compiler

examhopeinfo@gmail.com December 4, 2025
Syntax-directed translation A Simple Ompass Compiler
  • IT
  • Compiler Design
  • syntax-directed translation

A Simple Ompass Cempiler — Syntax-directed translation

examhopeinfo@gmail.com December 4, 2025

Recent Posts

  • Lexical Analysis — Understanding the Role of the Lexical Analyzer
  • Parsing — A Simple Onepass Compiler
  • A Simple Ompass Cempiler — Syntax-directed translation
  • A Simple Ompass Compiler — Syntax definition
  • Decidability: Countable Sets (The Halting Problem Revisited)

Archives

  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024

You may have missed

Understanding the Role of the Lexical Analyzer
  • Role of the Lexical Analyzer
  • Compiler Design
  • IT

Lexical Analysis — Understanding the Role of the Lexical Analyzer

examhopeinfo@gmail.com December 5, 2025
Parsing A Simple Ompass Compiler
  • IT
  • Compiler Design
  • Parsing

Parsing — A Simple Onepass Compiler

examhopeinfo@gmail.com December 4, 2025
Syntax-directed translation A Simple Ompass Compiler
  • IT
  • Compiler Design
  • syntax-directed translation

A Simple Ompass Cempiler — Syntax-directed translation

examhopeinfo@gmail.com December 4, 2025
A Simple Ompass Compiler
  • IT
  • A Simple Ompass Compiler
  • Compiler Design

A Simple Ompass Compiler — Syntax definition

examhopeinfo@gmail.com December 4, 2025

At ExamHope, we understand that preparing for exams can be challenging, overwhelming, and sometimes stressful. That’s why we are dedicated to providing high-quality educational resources, tips, and guidance to help students and aspirants achieve their goals with confidence. Whether you are preparing for competitive exams, school tests, or professional certifications, ExamHope is here to make your learning journey smarter, easier, and more effective.

Quick links

  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer
  • DMCA Policy

Category

  • Computer Network
  • Computer Organization and Architecture
  • Data Structures
  • C Language
  • Theory of Computation
  • Database
Copyright © All rights reserved for ExamHope. | MoreNews by AF themes.