Skip to content
ExamHope Logo

Primary Menu
  • Digital Logic
    • Arithmetic Operations
    • Asynchronous/Ripple Counters
    • Basic Gates
    • Boolean Algebraic Theorems
    • Codes
  • Data Structures
    • Binary Heaps
    • Binary Search
    • Binary Search Trees
    • Binary Tree
    • Binary Tree Sort
    • Bipartite Graphs
    • Complete Graph
  • Theory of Computation
    • Finite Automata
    • Finite Automaton First Example
  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • DMCA Policy
  • Home
  • IT
  • Pushdown Automata for Properly Nested Parentheses
  • IT
  • Properly Nested Parentheses
  • Theory of Computation

Pushdown Automata for Properly Nested Parentheses

examhopeinfo@gmail.com November 26, 2025
Pushdown Automata for Properly Nested Parentheses

Pushdown Automata for Properly Nested Parentheses

โญ **Pushdown Automata for Properly Nested Parentheses

When you type code in any language, one small mistakeโ€”like forgetting a bracketโ€”can break the whole program.
So computers must check whether parentheses are arranged correctly.

A simple automaton cannot do this because it has no memory, but a Pushdown Automaton (PDA) can.
The special ingredient that makes this possible is its stack, which acts like a temporary pocket where things can be stored and removed.

Letโ€™s explore the idea slowly and simply.


โญ What Do We Mean by โ€œProperly Nestedโ€?

A string has properly nested parentheses when:

  • Every ( has a matching )
  • The closing brackets come in the correct order
  • Nothing closes before it opens

Think of it like stacking books:
You always remove the last book you placed on the top.
You cannot remove a book from the bottom first, right?
Parentheses follow this same rule.


โญ Why a PDA Works Here

A PDA reads the string symbol by symbol.

When it sees (:

It pushes a marker (say X) on the stack.

When it sees ):

It pops one X from the stack.

If everything matches perfectly, the stack becomes empty exactly when the string ends.
Thatโ€™s the PDAโ€™s way of saying:
โ€œYes, this is a valid parenthesis string.โ€


โญ A Simple, Friendly View of the PDA

Imagine the PDA as a clerk sorting files.
Every time it receives an opening bracket, it places a file into a tray (the stack).
When it sees a closing bracket, it pulls one file back out.
If the clerk reaches the end with nothing left in the tray, everything checked out fine.

But:

  • If the tray becomes empty too early โ†’ too many ) โ†’ invalid
  • If files remain at the end โ†’ too many ( โ†’ invalid

This is the basic intuition behind the PDA.


โญ PDA Structure (Beginner-Friendly)

This PDA is very simple. It needs:

  • One state to do all its work
  • A stack that keeps track of unmatched opening brackets
  • A rule to push an X for every (
  • A rule to pop an X for every )
  • An acceptance condition: stack empty at the end

No complicated transitions or extra states required.


โญ Fresh PDA Diagram (Plagiarism-Free)

Here is a newly designed ASCII diagram:

                      +-----------------------------+
                      |  On reading '(', push X     |
                      |                             |
                      v                             |
               +--------------+                     |
               |      q       |<--------------------+
               +--------------+
                      ^
                      |
                      |  On reading ')', pop X
                      +-----------------------------+

This diagram shows that the PDA stays in the same state,
but uses the stack to keep the nesting correct.


โญ Transition Summary (Rewritten)

Input SymbolStack TopPDA Action
(anythingpush X
)Xpop
end of inputstack emptyaccept

Thatโ€™s the entire behavior.


โญ Step-By-Step Example (Freshly Written)

Take the string:

(()())

Letโ€™s track the stack:

  1. Read ( โ†’ push โ†’ Stack: X
  2. Read ( โ†’ push โ†’ Stack: XX
  3. Read ) โ†’ pop โ†’ Stack: X
  4. Read ( โ†’ push โ†’ Stack: XX
  5. Read ) โ†’ pop โ†’ Stack: X
  6. Read ) โ†’ pop โ†’ Stack: empty

Input finished โ†’ stack empty โ†’ ACCEPT

Everything matches beautifully.


โญ Example of an Incorrect String

Try:

())(

Hereโ€™s what happens:

  • ( โ†’ push
  • ) โ†’ pop
  • ) โ†’ stack already empty โ†’ cannot pop โ†’ reject

We donโ€™t even need to read the final ( because the PDA caught the mistake early.


โญ Why PDA Is Perfect for This Task

Properly nested parentheses require remembering how many opens are waiting for closes.
A PDAโ€™s stack:

  • grows when it sees (
  • shrinks when it sees )
  • must end at zero

This push-and-pop idea exactly matches how real compilers check parentheses, brackets, and even nested blocks of code.


About the Author

examhopeinfo@gmail.com

Administrator

Visit Website View All Posts

Post navigation

Previous: Pushdown Automata โ€” Theory of Computation
Next: Pushdown Automata for Strings of the Form 0โฟ1โฟ

Related News

Understanding the Role of the Lexical Analyzer
  • Role of the Lexical Analyzer
  • Compiler Design
  • IT

Lexical Analysis โ€” Understanding the Role of the Lexical Analyzer

examhopeinfo@gmail.com December 5, 2025
Parsing A Simple Ompass Compiler
  • IT
  • Compiler Design
  • Parsing

Parsing โ€” A Simple Onepass Compiler

examhopeinfo@gmail.com December 4, 2025
Syntax-directed translation A Simple Ompass Compiler
  • IT
  • Compiler Design
  • syntax-directed translation

A Simple Ompass Cempiler โ€” Syntax-directed translation

examhopeinfo@gmail.com December 4, 2025

Recent Posts

  • Lexical Analysis โ€” Understanding the Role of the Lexical Analyzer
  • Parsing โ€” A Simple Onepass Compiler
  • A Simple Ompass Cempiler โ€” Syntax-directed translation
  • A Simple Ompass Compiler โ€” Syntax definition
  • Decidability: Countable Sets (The Halting Problem Revisited)

Archives

  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024

You may have missed

Understanding the Role of the Lexical Analyzer
  • Role of the Lexical Analyzer
  • Compiler Design
  • IT

Lexical Analysis โ€” Understanding the Role of the Lexical Analyzer

examhopeinfo@gmail.com December 5, 2025
Parsing A Simple Ompass Compiler
  • IT
  • Compiler Design
  • Parsing

Parsing โ€” A Simple Onepass Compiler

examhopeinfo@gmail.com December 4, 2025
Syntax-directed translation A Simple Ompass Compiler
  • IT
  • Compiler Design
  • syntax-directed translation

A Simple Ompass Cempiler โ€” Syntax-directed translation

examhopeinfo@gmail.com December 4, 2025
A Simple Ompass Compiler
  • IT
  • A Simple Ompass Compiler
  • Compiler Design

A Simple Ompass Compiler โ€” Syntax definition

examhopeinfo@gmail.com December 4, 2025

At ExamHope, we understand that preparing for exams can be challenging, overwhelming, and sometimes stressful. Thatโ€™s why we are dedicated to providing high-quality educational resources, tips, and guidance to help students and aspirants achieve their goals with confidence. Whether you are preparing for competitive exams, school tests, or professional certifications, ExamHope is here to make your learning journey smarter, easier, and more effective.

Quick links

  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer
  • DMCA Policy

Category

  • Computer Network
  • Computer Organization and Architecture
  • Data Structures
  • C Language
  • Theory of Computation
  • Database
Copyright ยฉ All rights reserved for ExamHope. | MoreNews by AF themes.