Skip to content
ExamHope Logo

Primary Menu
  • Digital Logic
    • Arithmetic Operations
    • Asynchronous/Ripple Counters
    • Basic Gates
    • Boolean Algebraic Theorems
    • Codes
  • Data Structures
    • Binary Heaps
    • Binary Search
    • Binary Search Trees
    • Binary Tree
    • Binary Tree Sort
    • Bipartite Graphs
    • Complete Graph
  • Theory of Computation
    • Finite Automata
    • Finite Automaton First Example
  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • DMCA Policy
  • Home
  • IT
  • Chomsky Normal Form — Theory of Computation
  • IT
  • Chomsky Normal Form
  • Theory of Computation

Chomsky Normal Form — Theory of Computation

examhopeinfo@gmail.com November 25, 2025
Chomsky Normal Form — Theory of Computation

Chomsky Normal Form — Theory of Computation

🌱 What Is Chomsky Normal Form?

A CFG is said to be in Chomsky Normal Form (CNF) when every production rule follows one of only two shapes:

✔ 1. A → BC

A non-terminal produces two non-terminals.

✔ 2. A → a

A non-terminal produces one terminal symbol.

✔ Special case:

The start symbol may also allow:

S → ε
(only if the language includes the empty string)

That’s all.
No long rules.
No mixing terminals with variables.
No shortcuts.

CNF makes grammar extremely structured.


💡 Why Do We Convert Grammars into CNF?

Even though CNF may look restrictive, it gives us many advantages:

⭐ 1. Parsing becomes mechanical

Algorithms like CYK work only with CNF.

⭐ 2. Parse trees become perfectly binary

Every split produces exactly two branches, making tree shapes uniform.

⭐ 3. It helps in theoretical proofs

Many results in automata theory rely on CNF’s clean structure.

⭐ 4. It removes unnecessary mess

Rules become short, clear, and easy to follow.

Think of CNF like turning messy handwritten notes into a clean, organized digital document.


🎯 A Grammar That is NOT in CNF

Let’s take a small CFG:

S → aBB
B → bB | bb

This breaks CNF rules because:

  • aBB mixes terminals and variables
  • bB mixes terminal + variable
  • bb contains two terminals
  • Some rules have more than two symbols

CNF allows none of that.


🔧 How CNF Fixes the Grammar

When converting a grammar to CNF, we break down complex rules into small, neat pieces.

For example:

S → aBB
would eventually be rewritten using new helper symbols:

S → X B
X → a B

These new non-terminals exist purely to enforce CNF structure.
The meaning stays the same — only the shape changes.


🌳 A Simple CNF Grammar and Parse Tree

Consider the following clean CNF grammar:

S → AB
A → a
B → b

It generates the string "ab".

Here is its parse tree:

        S
       / \
      A   B
      |   |
      a   b

Every internal node splits into two children.
Every leaf is a terminal.
This neat binary shape is exactly what CNF aims for.


🧠 Important Things to Remember

Here’s a quick checklist in plain English:

✔ Productions must be either A → BC or A → a

Nothing else is allowed.

✔ No mixing terminals and non-terminals on the same right side

So rules like A → aB are not allowed.

✔ Long rules must be broken into pieces

A production like A → BCD must be rewritten step-by-step.

✔ Only the start symbol may produce ε

And only if the language includes the empty string.


About the Author

examhopeinfo@gmail.com

Administrator

Visit Website View All Posts

Post navigation

Previous: Context-Free Grammar That Verifies Addition
Next: Pushdown Automata — Theory of Computation

Related News

Understanding the Role of the Lexical Analyzer
  • Role of the Lexical Analyzer
  • Compiler Design
  • IT

Lexical Analysis — Understanding the Role of the Lexical Analyzer

examhopeinfo@gmail.com December 5, 2025
Parsing A Simple Ompass Compiler
  • IT
  • Compiler Design
  • Parsing

Parsing — A Simple Onepass Compiler

examhopeinfo@gmail.com December 4, 2025
Syntax-directed translation A Simple Ompass Compiler
  • IT
  • Compiler Design
  • syntax-directed translation

A Simple Ompass Cempiler — Syntax-directed translation

examhopeinfo@gmail.com December 4, 2025

Recent Posts

  • Lexical Analysis — Understanding the Role of the Lexical Analyzer
  • Parsing — A Simple Onepass Compiler
  • A Simple Ompass Cempiler — Syntax-directed translation
  • A Simple Ompass Compiler — Syntax definition
  • Decidability: Countable Sets (The Halting Problem Revisited)

Archives

  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024

You may have missed

Understanding the Role of the Lexical Analyzer
  • Role of the Lexical Analyzer
  • Compiler Design
  • IT

Lexical Analysis — Understanding the Role of the Lexical Analyzer

examhopeinfo@gmail.com December 5, 2025
Parsing A Simple Ompass Compiler
  • IT
  • Compiler Design
  • Parsing

Parsing — A Simple Onepass Compiler

examhopeinfo@gmail.com December 4, 2025
Syntax-directed translation A Simple Ompass Compiler
  • IT
  • Compiler Design
  • syntax-directed translation

A Simple Ompass Cempiler — Syntax-directed translation

examhopeinfo@gmail.com December 4, 2025
A Simple Ompass Compiler
  • IT
  • A Simple Ompass Compiler
  • Compiler Design

A Simple Ompass Compiler — Syntax definition

examhopeinfo@gmail.com December 4, 2025

At ExamHope, we understand that preparing for exams can be challenging, overwhelming, and sometimes stressful. That’s why we are dedicated to providing high-quality educational resources, tips, and guidance to help students and aspirants achieve their goals with confidence. Whether you are preparing for competitive exams, school tests, or professional certifications, ExamHope is here to make your learning journey smarter, easier, and more effective.

Quick links

  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer
  • DMCA Policy

Category

  • Computer Network
  • Computer Organization and Architecture
  • Data Structures
  • C Language
  • Theory of Computation
  • Database
Copyright © All rights reserved for ExamHope. | MoreNews by AF themes.