Dickson’s Theorem Theory of Computation

⭐ What Higman’s Theorem Says (in human words)

Here is the gentle version:

If your alphabet is nicely ordered, then any infinite list of strings made from that alphabet must contain two strings where the earlier one embeds into the later one.

In other words:

• You can’t produce an infinite list of completely “unrelated” strings.
• Eventually, structure appears.
• Chaos cannot grow forever.

This is a property called a well-quasi-ordering.

🎯 Why Is This Also Referred to as Dickson’s Theorem?

Dickson’s Theorem is actually an older result that deals with sequences of integer tuples rather than strings.
It says:

If you keep listing tuples of natural numbers, eventually one tuple will be component-wise ≤ another later tuple.

Higman’s Theorem generalizes this idea to strings, using the embedding relation instead of numeric comparison.

So, in many places, Higman’s Theorem is explained as a broader or more powerful version of Dickson’s Theorem.

Think of it like:

• Dickson’s Theorem → deals with numbers
• Higman’s Theorem → deals with strings
• Both → prevent endless disorder

🍎 A Simple Analogy

Imagine you collect children’s building blocks marked with letters (A, B, C…).
You build towers using these blocks.
Now imagine creating tower after tower, endlessly.

Higman’s Theorem says:

“Sooner or later, one of your earlier towers will appear inside one of your later towers, block by block, in the same order.”

Even if the later tower has many extra blocks, the original pattern must still show up.

You cannot avoid this forever.

📘 Small Visual Diagram

Below is a simple ASCII-style diagram showing how embedding works:

String 1:       b    c
                 \    \
String 2:    a   b   X   Y   c   d

Here,

• b lines up with b,
• c lines up with c,
  and order is preserved.

This is the kind of relationship Higman’s Theorem guarantees will eventually appear.

🧠 Why This Matters in Theory of Computation

Higman’s Theorem (and Dickson’s Theorem) are extremely useful because they help prove:

• A machine cannot generate endless complexity in certain conditions.
• Certain rewriting systems must terminate.
• Some language families cannot be infinite in a disorderly way.
• Many infinite-state problems still have guaranteed structure.

Whenever we face a problem that threatens to go on forever,
these theorems are like a safety net.

They quietly say,
“Don’t worry, things must eventually line up.”

About the Author

examhopeinfo@gmail.com

Administrator

Visit Website View All Posts