Skip to content
ExamHope Logo

Primary Menu
  • Computer Network
    • Application Layer MCQ
    • Application Layer Protocols
    • Network Layers
    • Application Layer
    • OSI Model
    • TCP/IP Model
  • Database
    • Database-Detail
    • deadlock
    • ER Diagram
    • File Organization/Indexing
    • Functional Depandancy
    • Locking Protocols
    • Lossless Decomposition
    • Recoverability
    • RELATIONAL ALGEBRA
    • Relational Calculus
    • Serializability
    • SQL
    • Timestamp
  • Digital Logic
    • Boolean Algebra
    • Combinational and Sequential Circuits
    • Minimization
    • Number representations and computer arithmetic
  • Software Project Management
    • 4P
    • MCQ-SPM
    • People in Project
    • Project Decomposition Techniques
    • Project Lifecycle
    • Project Management
    • Project Risk Analysis and Management
    • Project Tracking & Sheduling
    • Software Auditing
    • Software Configuration Management (SCM)
    • Software measurement metrics
    • Software Process Models
    • Software Quality Assurance (SQA)
  • Software Engineering
    • SDLC
    • Implementation
    • Maintenance
    • Planning and Requirment Gathering
    • System Design
    • Testing
  • Computer Organization and Architecture
    • ALU
    • Datapath and Control Unit
    • I/O Interface
    • Instruction Pipelining and Pipeline Hazards
    • Machine instructions and addressing modes
    • Memory Hierarchy: Cache, Main Memory, Secondary Storage
  • C Language
    • Arrays
    • Character set, Identifiers, Keywords & Data Types
    • Control Flow
    • Defining and Calling Functions
    • Function Prototypes and Parameters
    • Input/Output Functions
    • Introduction to C Language and History
    • Operators MCQs
    • Pointers
    • Program Structure, Compilation, and Execution
    • File Handling
  • Data Structures
    • Arrays
    • Binary Heaps
    • Graphs
    • Queue
    • STACKS
    • Linked Lists
    • Trees
    • Divide & Conquer
    • Graph Traversal
    • Dynamic Programming
    • Greedy Techniques
    • Hashing
  • Theory of Computation
    • Turing Machines
    • Undecidability
    • Pumping Lemma
    • Pushdown Automata
    • Regular Expressions
    • Regular Language
  • Compiler Design
    • Lexical Analysis
    • Common Subexpression Elimination
    • Intermediate Code Generation
    • CONSTANT PROPAGATION
    • Liveness Analysis
    • Local Optimization
    • Parsing
    • Runtime Environments
  • Operating Systems
    • syntax-directed translation
    • Threads
    • Virtual Memory
    • System Calls
    • Inter-Process Communication
    • Memory Management
    • Process Synchronization — Operating System
    • Processes
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Home
  • IT
  • Proof Techniques: The Pigeonhole Principle
  • The Pigeonhole Principle
  • IT
  • Theory of Computation

Proof Techniques: The Pigeonhole Principle

examhopeinfo@gmail.com November 18, 2025
The Pigeonhole Principle

The Pigeonhole Principle

What is the Pigeonhole Principle?

The pigeonhole principle says:

“If you try to place more objects than the number of containers, at least one container will get at least two objects.”

Or in simpler words:

“Too many items, too few boxes → something must share space.”

This idea looks almost too obvious…
yet it helps us prove surprisingly deep results in mathematics and in the Theory of Computation.


Why is it called the ‘pigeonhole’ principle?

Long ago, people used small compartments called pigeonholes to store documents and letters.
Each mail would go into one slot.

If you have:

  • 7 letters
  • 5 pigeonholes

Then at least one pigeonhole gets 2 or more letters.
It’s just unavoidable.


🌱 A Simple Diagram

Here’s a small visual to make the idea feel natural:

Pigeonholes (Boxes):      P1   P2   P3
                           |    |    |
Objects (Pigeons):   O1  O2  O3  O4

Try placing 4 objects into 3 boxes:

       O1 → P1
       O2 → P2
       O3 → P3
       O4 → ??  No empty box left!

So O1, O2, O3 fit,
but O4 must share with some P1 / P2 / P3.

This is the principle in action.


🧠 Why is the pigeonhole principle useful in Theory of Computation?

Even though it sounds like a simple counting idea, it becomes a powerful proof tool.

You’ll often use it to show things like:

  • Some strings must repeat.
  • Some states in an automaton must be visited more than once.
  • A machine cannot handle too many different inputs with too few states.
  • A language cannot be recognized with limited memory.

Most importantly, it helps prove impossibility results.


🎒 Example (Automata Perspective)

Suppose you have a DFA with 5 states, and you run it on a string of 7 characters.

Each character moves the DFA from one state to another.

You now have a sequence of 8 state visits (including the starting state).

But there are only 5 states.

So at least one state must repeat.

This repeated state is the key idea behind the Pumping Lemma for regular languages.

All of this comes directly from the pigeonhole principle.


🧩 A Friendly Real-Life Example

Imagine you’re in a classroom with 31 students.
You ask everyone to tell you their birth month.

There are only 12 months.

Since 31 > 12:

➡️ At least three students must share the same birth month.
(Why three? Because 31 ÷ 12 is more than 2.)

Even if birthdays seem “random,”
the pigeonhole principle guarantees this.


🛠️ How We Use It in Proofs

A typical pigeonhole-based proof goes like this:

  1. Identify the objects.
    These could be strings, states, numbers, or anything.
  2. Identify the pigeonholes.
    These are categories or containers.
  3. Show that the number of objects > number of pigeonholes.
  4. Conclude:
    At least one pigeonhole has 2 or more objects.

That’s all!
No calculations, no complex logic — just counting.


🌟 A Small Computation Example

Claim:
If a Turing machine has 20 states, and it processes an input of 30 steps,
then at least one state must repeat.

Reason (Pigeonhole Principle):

  • Number of “pigeonholes” = 20 states.
  • Number of “pigeons” = 31 state visits (start + 30 moves).

Since 31 > 20,
➡️ at least one state is visited more than once.


Author Profile

examhopeinfo@gmail.com
Latest entries
  • Equivalence of regular expressions and regular languages Theory of ComputationEquivalence of Regular Expressions and Regular LanguagesNovember 20, 2025Equivalence of Regular Expressions and Regular Languages
  • Regular Expressions Theory of ComputationRegular ExpressionsNovember 20, 2025Regular Expressions — Theory of Computation
  • Closure Under the Regular OperationsITNovember 19, 2025Closure Under the Regular Operations — Theory of Computation
  • Equivalence of DFAs and NFAsITNovember 19, 2025Equivalence of DFAs and NFAs

About the Author

examhopeinfo@gmail.com

Administrator

Visit Website View All Posts

Post navigation

Previous: Proofs by Contradiction — Proof Techniques in Theory of Computation
Next: Proof Techniques: Proofs by Induction

Related News

Equivalence of regular expressions and regular languages Theory of Computation
  • Equivalence of Regular Expressions and Regular Languages
  • IT
  • Theory of Computation

Equivalence of Regular Expressions and Regular Languages

examhopeinfo@gmail.com November 20, 2025
Regular Expressions Theory of Computation
  • Regular Expressions
  • IT
  • Theory of Computation

Regular Expressions — Theory of Computation

examhopeinfo@gmail.com November 20, 2025
Closure Under the Regular Operations
  • IT
  • Closure Under the Regular Operations
  • Theory of Computation

Closure Under the Regular Operations — Theory of Computation

examhopeinfo@gmail.com November 19, 2025

Recent Posts

  • Equivalence of Regular Expressions and Regular Languages
  • Regular Expressions — Theory of Computation
  • Closure Under the Regular Operations — Theory of Computation
  • Equivalence of DFAs and NFAs
  • Nondeterministic Finite Automata

Archives

  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024

You may have missed

Equivalence of regular expressions and regular languages Theory of Computation
  • Equivalence of Regular Expressions and Regular Languages
  • IT
  • Theory of Computation

Equivalence of Regular Expressions and Regular Languages

examhopeinfo@gmail.com November 20, 2025
Regular Expressions Theory of Computation
  • Regular Expressions
  • IT
  • Theory of Computation

Regular Expressions — Theory of Computation

examhopeinfo@gmail.com November 20, 2025
Closure Under the Regular Operations
  • IT
  • Closure Under the Regular Operations
  • Theory of Computation

Closure Under the Regular Operations — Theory of Computation

examhopeinfo@gmail.com November 19, 2025
Equivalence of DFAs and NFAs
  • IT
  • Equivalence of DFAs and NFAs

Equivalence of DFAs and NFAs

examhopeinfo@gmail.com November 19, 2025

Office Address :-34A Hastinapur C Gandhi Path West Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur

Contact Details:-7792975589

Email:-Examhopeinfo@gmail.com

Our Site is based on Exam Purpose

Copyright © All rights reserved for ExamHope. | MoreNews by AF themes.